William Walsh was kind enough to write the Word .doc to a PDF for me. I have since updated the site with this PDF version of the document which can be found here...
http://www.byte.org/hwg/icann-reform-cda-v0r0d1-062602.pdf -rwr ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bret Fausett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:14 PM Subject: [registrars] Tucows Draft Proposal and Request for Comments Concerning ICANN's Role in Relation to Contracted Parties Folks, Based on further consideration of the latest ERC recommendations we have created a new request for comments that outlines the creation of a commercial disputes arbitration process that need live within the ICANN structure. This draft proposal synthesises the ideas resulting from a number of constituency and private conversations at the ICANN Bucharest meeting. Thank you to all of you that contributed to the ideas in this document whether you realized that you were contributing or not ;) The document can be found at the links below - they can be linked to from http://www.byte.org/heathrow/ HTML http://www.byte.org/heathrow/icann-reform-cda-v0r0d1-062602.html WORD http://www.byte.org/heathrow/icann-reform-cda-v0r0d1-062602.doc We will need to discuss the specific processes that the CDA will require. We request that like-minded individuals join the moderated AWG mailing list by subscribing via http://www.byte.org/heathrow and begin exploring what this process will look like. We strongly feel that adoption of this process within the new ICANN structure will create significant efficiencies within the new ICANN and eliminate some of the procedural deadlock that we have seen on a number of issues. Comments concerning the draft itself can also be tabled via the AWG discussion list. Ce poti lucra ast�zi nu l�sa pe m�ine. -rwr
