Some resellers have built in integral systems based on actions they can perform via the RWI. True, it's not supported.
But by not catering to these folks (at least providing them a transition period when we move triggers to the API) we may very well break them. Hurting their business isn't really in our best interest. As I've stated previously, it's all about the transition :) Charles Daminato OpenSRS Product Manager Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Phillip Beazley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: July 17, 2002 4:34 PM > To: Charles Daminato > Cc: Dave Warren; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Low Priority Request > > > At 04:21 PM 7/17/2002 -0400, Charles Daminato wrote: > > >In the interim, people have found themselves attempting to automate > >activities only done via the RWI by using a script (hacked API) > > > >It's the transition that we'll have to be careful of :) > > But since it's not "supported" behavior, I don't understand why you're > worried about stepping on toes. Yes, it'll disrupt their stuff but > otherwise anyone who is not doing that is being penalized for > them doing this. > > If they want to continue, they should be allowed to do so, using the > current RWI "as-is" but only at batch.opensrs.net. > > That said, I do use a few automated processes against the RWI but I'm > willing to change them and I knew the risks of doing so. I imagine the > others do, too. > > > -- > Phillip Beazley > FutureSights -- Website Hosting, Development & E-commerce > Visit http://www.futuresights.com/ or call 727-578-9600. >
