>Apparently there was a DoS attack on the root servers this week, but
>it went largely unnoticed (if we don't notice it, its unnoticable....;)
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/10/23/internet.attack.ap/

>Service was restored after experts enacted defensive measures 
>and the attack suddenly stopped. 
the attackers stopped after having demonstrated the problem, 
that proves that the operators are working well >;?)

>"...and life goes on," said Louis Touton, vice president for ICANN
as always, without addressing the problems at the root.

>"We were prepared, we responded quickly," said Brian O'Shaughnessy, a spokesman
>for VeriSign Inc., which operates two of the 13 computers in northern Virginia. 
what a bunch of pathetic liars :-)

it's only a matter of time until existing free roots will win over 
and make things more stable. everyone can choose today.
what is the TTL of the new ministry of propaganda ?

kind regards     philippe, http://freeroots.com/

            --- *** ---

Key Internet servers hit by attack

Wednesday, October 23, 2002 Posted: 3:48 AM EDT (0748 GMT)

RELATED
* Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers   
* National Infrastructure Protection Center  
* Department of Homeland Security  
* VeriSign  

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Nine of the 13 computer servers that manage global Internet traffic 
were crippled by a powerful electronic attack this week, officials said. 

But most Internet users didn't notice because the attack only lasted an hour. Its 
origin was not known, and the FBI and White House were investigating. 

One official described Monday's attack as the most sophisticated and large-scale 
assault against these crucial computers in the history of the Internet. 

Seven of the 13 servers failed to respond to legitimate network traffic and two others 
failed intermittently during the attack, officials confirmed. 

The FBI's National Infrastructure Protection Center was "aware of the denial of 
service attack and is addressing this matter," spokesman Steven Berry said. 

Service was restored after experts enacted defensive measures and the attack suddenly 
stopped. 

The 13 computers are spread geographically across the globe as precaution against 
physical disasters and operated by U.S. government agencies, universities, 
corporations and private organizations. 

"As best we can tell, no user noticed and the attack was dealt with and life goes on," 
said Louis Touton, vice president for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and 
Numbers, the Internet's key governing body. 

"We were prepared, we responded quickly," said Brian O'Shaughnessy, a spokesman for 
VeriSign Inc., which operates two of the 13 computers in northern Virginia. 

Computer experts who manage some of the affected computers, speaking on condition of 
anonymity, said they were cooperating with the White House through its Office of 
Homeland Security and the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board. 

As best we can tell, no user noticed and the attack was dealt with and life goes on. 

-- ICANN Vice President Louis Touton 
        

Richard Clarke, President Bush's top cyber-security adviser and head of the protection 
board, has warned for months that an attack against the Internet's 13 so-called root 
server computers could be greatly disruptive. 

These experts said the attack, which started about 4:45 p.m. EDT Monday, transmitted 
data to each targeted root server 30 to 40 times normal amounts. One said that just 
one additional failure would have disrupted e-mails and Web browsing across parts of 
the Internet. 

Monday's attack wasn't more disruptive because many Internet providers and large 
corporations and organizations routinely store, or "cache," popular Web directory 
information for better performance. 

"The Internet was designed to be able to take outages, but when you take the root 
servers out, you don't know how long you can work without them," said Alan Paller, 
director of research at the SANS Institute, a security organization based in Bethesda, 
Maryland. 

Although the Internet theoretically can operate with only a single root server, its 
performance would slow if more than four root servers failed for any appreciable 
length of time. 

In August 2000, four of the 13 root servers failed for a brief period because of a 
technical glitch. 

A more serious problem involving root servers occurred in July 1997 after experts 
transferred a garbled directory list to seven root servers and failed to correct the 
problem for four hours. Traffic on much of the Internet ground to a halt. 

Reply via email to