I have been an OpenSRS reseller and a member of this list since April 2000.
Although domain name registration is not my primary business, it continues
to be an important part of my overall plan.  My account has brought 4,931
domain-years of business to Tucows so far.

Those of us who have been here for awhile can recall dozens of reseller
issues that have come up, arguments pro and con, statements by Tucows
addressing the problems, and eventually a resolution.  If you look back at
the responses in the early days and compare them to those of more recent
times, you can't help but get a sense of a change in attitude at Tucows.
The focus now seems to be more on "the numbers" and less on the merits.

Now, don't get me wrong, I am a capitalist through and through.  The job of
every business is to be profitable, and you cannot ignore the numbers.  But
there is a difference between observing good results from focusing on
customer needs, and focusing only on the results.  The earlier approach at
Tucows seemed to be to provide what customers asked for, to do business in a
fair manner, and to listen to constructive criticism.  The approach was
successful, at least from the measure of the number of domain names
registered.  But as seems inevitable as companies grow, the link between
customers and management has grown weaker.

I have stayed with Tucows as my primary registrar even though other
registrars continue to offer more attractive pricing.  (My effective
wholesale price at OpenSRS is actually higher today than it was in the early
days when there were rebates.)  I made this decision consciously based on my
experience with Tucows, my concern that a registrar needs to make a certain
amount of money to stay in business for the long term, and the overall "good
feeling" I had from being an OpenSRS reseller.  But the domain name business
is in a constant state of flux, and each of us must constantly re-evaluate
our supplier relationships.  The big question for me is whether or not
Tucows actually wants to keep my business.  And if they do, how are they
showing it?

The referral list has been discussed periodically over the past couple of
years. The list itself is not an issue for me - I don't want to be on the
list because I don't actively market a retail registration business.  But
seeing how Tucows responds to other "little guys" who do want to be listed
is very important to me.  It's hard to find any indication that Tucows is
actively trying to promote the small reseller.  I would think anything they
could do to help the little guy to become more successful would be good for
their business.  (I would also think the biggest resellers are the more
likely candidates to become accredited registrars and leave the fold.)

Recently I brought up Verisign's upcoming Secondary Market Program, looking
for a committment from Tucows that it would be offerred through OpenSRS
resellers.  I may be alone in my opinion that SMP will be a major factor in
choosing a registrar in the year to come, but the fact is that it is a
wholesale registry product, and the business of registrars is to supply
registry products to their customers.  I felt the choice to not provide the
service could be a costly one for Tucows, but in a private email a Tucows
representative told me, "...we do not have the resellers that would leave us
over not offering this product, and if the clients we do have in this
industry do leave, there would be little to no impact to our operations
whatsoever..."  Would the "old Tucows" have responded in this manner?

I realize a lot of Tucows' success can be attributed to Network Solutions'
disastrous business practices.  OpenSRS was started at the right time with
the right message to catch a large part of the mass exodus from NSI.  And it
has been fashionable to trash NSI and Verisign, which has led to an
automatic disdain for anything coming from Verisign.  But like it or not,
Verisign is the com/net registry, and every .com and .net domain name
registered or renewed is the sale of a Verisign product.  The registrar is
selling a commodity item.  Sure, there are things that differentiate OpenSRS
from NSI, Register.com, and the over 100 other registrars that now exist.
But the core function of a registrar is to provide registry products
efficiently.  And when a registrar decides not to offer a new registry
product, they force their customers to go elsewhere to buy that product.  It
is hard to understand a registrar willingly sending their customers to other
registrars.  It comes off as arrogant to say, "If you need that, then we
don't need you."  Now it appears as though WLS is coming.  Will Tucows
condemn WLS as another Verisign travesty of fair trade, or embrace it as a
new product some customers may actually want to purchase?

Tucows, now with a stock price of 23 cents and a market cap of under 15
million, has become the number two registrar in terms of com/net/org
registrations in less than three years.  That's a fantastic achievement.  It
would be easy to think, based on that success, that everything is rosy and
future success is assured.  Complacency is dangerous, and things happen fast
in the domain name business.  I hope someone at Tucows is watching the
trends, looking ahead at the winds of change, and making plans for continued
success in the future.  I know I am.

Reply via email to