:)

I can't provide you with any authoritative FAQ, but I know
what you're referring to.

If I look up one of my domains that used to be with NetSol,
it shows *OLD* IP addresses for my name servers.

e.g.,

   NS.ATLCON.NET   207.159.82.2

In fact, it's 

   NS.ATLCON.NET   65.82.159.6

This changed a couple of years ago after the domain had
already been transferred from NetSol to TUCOWS.

The problem is that NetSol doesn't recognize that the
name servers are no longer managed in their database, and
they never re-resolve to get the proper IP addresses.

As I understand it, the registry stores the nameserver
*NAME*, not the address, as the authoritative entry, and
these are resolved on the fly by the DNS resolver.

So as long as the nameserver NAMES that are shown in the
WHOIS are correct, then everything will work just fine.

Regards,
Eric Longman
Atl-Connect Internet Services

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Atl-Connect Internet Services   http://www.atlcon.net |
| 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288              770 590-0888 |
| Marietta, GA 30064-1685            [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
  


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of JB Segal
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(I could have sworn I sent this out on 2/7, but it doesn't seem to have
gotten through, nor do I recall a bounce on it...if it did, I'm sorry
for the duplication...)

Does anyone have a nice, detailed authoritative FAQ - with citation,
prefereably (and I supposed "I work for the Tucows OSRS Registry" is
probably going to be authoritative enough for the folks I have to give
this to - about what data is in Whois, where it comes from and how it
really isn't authoritative, as pertains to NS addresses?

I have customers who are using NS' on domains registered with one
registry for their domains, registered (someplace else, soon with me),
where the Whois data got out of sync when their NS Provider renumbered.
I have to try to convince them that this isn't a tragic flaw and that
they're not going off the air (even though they haven't already) soon
because of it.

Thanks very much,
JB



Reply via email to