You guys are missing the "one stop shopping" concept. Elliot is right. A full solution is essential, although parts of the offering may not be profitable.
Few people realize that theaters essentially give away the movie to sell their overpriced popcorn, cokes, and candy. Loren Colin Viebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have to question the wisdom in this notion. Obviously for any given > > product offering there is a threshold below which it is not profitable > > (either because revenue is zero or negative). Perhaps Tucows did some > > forecasting and concluded that the potential revenues from a service > > nobody really wants to buy or sell would be outweighed by the costs of > > setting it up. > > Ah ... but you are forgetting the first rule of the dot-com economy: > > "Sell at a loss, and make it up in volume!" > > - Colin >
