Seems to me like this is something that can easily be fixed by doing the
listing like so:
01
02
03
..
10
unless for some reason that is unacceptable.
Faeren.
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 17:44 -0400, Walton wrote:
> Depends on your point of view.
> They probably call that a "Feature".
>
> -Dave Walton
> -----Original Message-----
> Hello,
>
> Our staff has started complaining recently about a change to the RWI. I
> finally had a chance to look at it today and see what they mean...
>
> If you use the RWI to manually renew a domain name, the renewal period
> field is now ordered as follows:
>
> 1 year
> 10 years
> 2 years
> 3 years
> 4 years
> 5 years
> 6 years
> 7 years
> 8 years
> 9 years
>
> They complained that the 10 years option is now in the second position,
> where 2 years used to be. They almost didn't catch that 10 years was
> selected when they were renewing a domain for 2 years. I'm not sure why
> the order was changed, but I do consider this a bug.
