I've always been under the impression that Subversion supported Tags. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch04s06.html
Unless I'm missing something as I'm not a programmer and don't deal with revision control software on a daily basis. -- David On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Mark Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm almost embarrassed to say this, but I have my source code in a CVS > repository. > > OK, it is mainly just me, but occasionally, I have other collaborators. > It has been in service on the same ip address for over a decade. The > machines may have changed, but the repository has not. > > Seriously, I need an opinion about what to use. I don't particularly > like subversion, I'm used to CVS and if I'm going to upgrade by my > source and my habbits I want to adjust to something better. Subversion's > stated goal was to be better than CVS, and that's a little short sighted > IMHO. I think svn's lack of tagging makes it a deal breaker. > > Is git any good? > What about Mercurial? Bazaar? > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
