Hey Mark, IMO I think there are a few important features: 1. The backups must be mountable, allowing for file browsing and single file restoration. 2. The backup should NOT be file based, it should be image based. 3. Encrypted backups. I want the backups to be encrypted and I want the encryption to be self contained in the backup. This means that you can take the backup to ANY computer with the backup software and open the backup file by entering a password.
Acronis has all of these features, but it's expensive and I don't believe the software will run on these linux nas devices you've specified. --Chris On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mark Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > While I've got some free time on my hands, I decided to start work on a > project. At its core, it is very much like a standard backup system. > What makes it different from a regular backup is what you do with the > data retrieved after the backup. I know it is a long shot or even a > fools errand to start anything so pedantic and well traveled, but there > is a specific need that I believe has been identified, but requires > "backup" done in a specific manner. Anyway, who knows? I'm already > testing and using some of the core pieces and I have to say, I like it. > > My target OS are Windows, MacOS, and Linux. It will run on desktops, > servers, and even some of these little NAS boxes that run Linux. > > My question for you guys is what do you *want* in a backup. We've all > used these feature laden things that are out there, 99% of which is > pointless. What are "must haves?" What is something you've wanted but > can't find? What are features that are most pointless and why? > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
