On 02/20/2011 06:57 AM, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I have found that if I run, for example, aureport --summary -ts today > -te today on a repeated basis (testing, for example) on an F10 system, > the correct results are repeated. But, if I try it repeatedly on an > F12 system, the correct results appear to be accurate the first time, > then reset to 0 subsequent times. > > Why does F10 remember the summary and F12 appears to clear out the > results after the first run? Where are the details collected from > and stored? I presume /var/log/*? But why does one remember the > settings and the other appear to cache the results? > > I'm been trying to learn more about how aureport works. F10 is great > in actively showing me every change - updated summaries and login > attempts, and it remembers the results every time I request them. > F12 does not seem to capture new login attempts immediately, for > either login query or summary query. Why is F12 apparently slower or > simply more finicky than F10? Seems to work correctly on F14.
-- Jerry Feldman <[email protected]> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
