On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:51:48AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > From: discuss-boun...@blu.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@blu.org] On Behalf
> > Of David Kramer
> > 
> > AT&T modifies
> > their Android phones so you can't install software from anywhere else
> 
> What would be the motivation for AT&T to do such a thing?  Does this
> statement warrant a fact-check?

David has an ATT Android phone. He's competent to make such a
proclamation.

Also, it has been widely reported in Engadget, Gizmodo, Ars
Technica, blah, blah, blah.

If you wanted a fact check, why didn't you Google for one?

Relevant terms could be "ATT Android disable sideload"

You would also find that there are several ways around, ranging
in severity from "use the adb dev tool to load via USB" to "root
your Android".

-dsr-


-- 
http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference.
You can't defend freedom by getting rid of it.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to