On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Shirley Márquez Dúlcey wrote:

> How can piracy be a consideration for channels that are already available at 
> higher quality (the versions carried on cable are re-encoded at lower 
> bitrates than the broadcasts) for free?

I'm not a cable person, but let me hazard a guess. I'm guessing that the 
company has a license with those providers to broadcast them only in a certain 
region. If you were to be able to capture the bits and stream/redistribute them 
(and there a number of different places where people actually do this), that 
would be a problem for them.

        -- dNb
 
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to