On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Shirley Márquez Dúlcey wrote:
> How can piracy be a consideration for channels that are already available at
> higher quality (the versions carried on cable are re-encoded at lower
> bitrates than the broadcasts) for free?
I'm not a cable person, but let me hazard a guess. I'm guessing that the
company has a license with those providers to broadcast them only in a certain
region. If you were to be able to capture the bits and stream/redistribute them
(and there a number of different places where people actually do this), that
would be a problem for them.
-- dNb
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss