On 07/11/2012 03:09 PM, Nuno Sucena Almeida wrote: > On 07/11/2012 02:57 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote: >> That sounds like a lot of extra latency for looking up simple things >> (i.e UID -> username mappings i.e. "ls -l"). I don't know if local >> caching is included the standard LDAP/NSS setup, but I would check >> myself to be sure. >> >> Good Luck, >> Bill Bogstad > You can setup a local ldap slave replication server, which would also be > convenient if the external network goes down. For the migration, a > mapping file and script to update uids/guids would probably work just fine. > Cheers, > Nuno > Yes. I'm not all that concerned about locally mapping stuff. It is just a bit of extra work. A local slave replication of local caching would be better. The issue right now is to get the TOR people to make a few decisions.
-- Jerry Feldman <[email protected]> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
