On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:03:58AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:55:37PM -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote: > > Hopefully this will provide some clues. Note that I currently have > > the server set up as one to one nat. I've tried a bunch of other > > configurations but this one appears to function as desired. The > > server has ufw enabled to allow port 80. > > If it functions as desired, then what is the problem?
How do you update a webserver that can't contact the package depots? > You've been told by multiple people that one-to-one NAT is not going > to work correctly. It will work just fine, if it's set up properly. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
