> From: Bill Bogstad [mailto:[email protected]] > > You also keep implying that there are substantial financial benefits > received by people/entities who attempt to enforce free software > licenses. I would request that you provide some evidence of this. > I'm not saying they didn't make some money (I don't know). I'm just > suggesting that it is not substantial.
No - because I'm sick of this thread too and that's just a tangent. It is also, not what I really care about. (As you obviously agree.) The point is, Mark, claiming that CDDL is bad and equating CDDL to a lack of freedom, is rubbish. The main difference between CDDL and GPL is whether or not a binary compiled from different-licensed sources needs to be (a) prohibited from distribution, as it is in the GPL, or (b) licensed under the same license. Mark, where do you draw the line, for a "derivative work?" Static linking? VMDK files? Laptops? _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
