Nope, sorry, that's completely irrelevant to the subject of this thread. To argue that FreeBSD desktops are better than Linux desktops, when you really mean just the MacOSX desktop, is disingenuous at best . It serves only to muddy the conversation and derail the conversation.
If your intent was to troll the conversation, then congratulations; mission accomplished. On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Richard Pieri <[email protected]>wrote: > John Abreau wrote: > >> OS X is a FreBSD desktop? Please tell me how I can install the OS X >> desktop on a generic FreeBSD system. >> > > Yes, it is a FreeBSD desktop: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/**articles/explaining-bsd/** > comparing-bsd-and-linux.html<http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/explaining-bsd/comparing-bsd-and-linux.html> > > "Mac OS® X is the latest version of the operating system for Apple > Computer Inc.'s Macintosh® line. The BSD core of this operating system, > Darwin, is available as a fully functional open source operating system for > x86 and PPC computers. The Aqua/Quartz graphics system and many other > proprietary aspects of Mac OS® X remain closed-source, however. Several > Darwin developers are also FreeBSD committers, and vice-versa." > > It's not a free desktop, but it's still a FreeBSD desktop. > > > -- > Rich P. > ______________________________**_________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/**listinfo/discuss<http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix PGP KeyID: 32A492D8 / Email: [email protected] PGP FP: 7834 AEC2 EFA3 565C A4B6 9BA4 0ACB AD85 32A4 92D8 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
