if "it's not exposed to the world" is known to be a true statement, then what is he concerned about?
I will say that MediaWiki *is* very hard to lock down if that statement is not known to be true. Most wikis fall into one of two camps: "Information wants to be free and that's what wikis are for so why would you want to lock it down?" and "Today's internet is a scary place and even wikis need access control". There's not much in the middle. I LOVE Foswiki for many reasons, but very high on the list is that it has full user/group authorizations at the system level, the wiki level, and at the page level. On 01/31/2014 01:56 PM, Jeffrey Young wrote: > I want to implement a Media Wiki at work, but my boss is worried about > security risks. To me it seems simple, if it's not exposed to the world, > what's the problem? Am I missing something? > > Thanks, > Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
