On 02/17/2014 09:28 AM, Richard Pieri wrote:
You could remove the version you don't like and install
the version you want from sources.
It's a solution, a particularly bad one in the long run in
my opinion. You won't get any security updates that way
other than those you patch in and compile yourself.
Moving away from SMB/CIFS is the better long-term move.
The thing is I can keep all of the current version, I only
need the one binary from the past as they can run concurrent
if need be.
Moving away would be good if I knew what pitfalls the
alternatives have. The thing is I know a lot about the
pitfalls of samba including a in depth document that
illustrates the kludges that have been implemented to make
it work as well as numerous bug reports.
Now I have invested in some scripts to automate the mounting
of shares for my users and that is a big time commitment
that I no longer have.
--
Jim KR
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
