More precisely, I installed Mailman 2.1.18 in parallel with the older Mailman 2.1.12, so that both coexist on the server, and I created a sample list under 2.1.18 for Jerry to test with.
All the production lists are still running under 2.1.12. We won't begin migrating them to the 2.1.18 instance until after Jerry completes his tests and we review the results. Jerry mentioned he was going on vacation this week, and won't be back until next Tuesday. I assume this means he'll be deferring the testing process until he returns. On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Bill Ricker [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > ​Looks like the cascade didn't happen. A post on the GPS phone threads > was > > from Yahoo; Gmail put it in my SPAM folder with a warning, i did not get > > unsubscribed. > > Well, as John said on Thurs/Fri, they've updated the blu mail server to > mailman 2.1.18, which supports dmarc rejection gracefully. But it was not > clear that dmarc rejection policy had been *configured* yet. > > What I observe is: > > A message from Bill Ricker @gmail simply says it's from Bill Ricker. > A message from Oliver Holmes @yahoo says it's from the BLU list server, on > behalf of Oliver Holmes @yahoo. > > This seems to suggest that the dmarc rejection stuff has been enabled on > the blu list server. > > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix Email [email protected] / WWW http://www.abreau.net / 2013 PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6 2013 / ID 0x920063C6 / FP A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23 C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6 2011 / ID 0x32A492D8 / FP 7834 AEC2 EFA3 565C A4B6 9BA4 0ACB AD85 32A4 92D8 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
