On Sun, 2014-11-30 at 00:52 +0000, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: > > The arguments about preventing downtime are bunk, unless somebody > > shows that systemd causes downtime. Which it doesn't. > > There's a reason it's difficult to come up with a concrete argument > against systemd.
YALS - Yet Another Lennart System I have no issue with systemd, just like I had no issue with upstart. But the anti-upstart people really pissed me off, because the argument always went: "It's Ubuntu and thus objectionable because of other stuff Canonical have done" While of course that argument never seemed to be applicable to systemd: "It's Lennart and thus objectionable because of other stuff (pulse) he's done" If we were playing reputation fairly, systemd would have been rejected. And it feels like the community plays favorites in a corrupt way. Not really looking at the merits of systems reasonably but playing vendetta and fait accompli politics. Systemd is what we're all going to use regardless. But don't ask me to be happy about it. Martin Owens _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss