On 07/10/2015 03:36 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On 7/10/2015 3:08 PM, Kent Borg wrote:
But like many nice ideas, this one only goes so far: after a few cycles
you can't get matched replacement disks and a bit later technology
likely changes enough you need to rethink everything.
This is one way that ZFS and Btrfs are superior: they don't require
matching drives like traditional RAID.
MooseFS goes one step further, being RAIN, not
only it doesn't require matching hard-drives but it doesn't
require matching chunk servers either.
-- F. Ozbek
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
