On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:12:06AM -0700, Rich Braun wrote: > > Of the alternatives out there, the one that looks most promising in light of > these requirements is SpiderOak. But no one else here has named that one so I > assume it's an obscure vendor that few of us have heard of. >
I've investigated SpiderOak. Add to your requirements: open-source client and they fail. Oh, wait, they don't anymore: https://github.com/SpiderOak/SpiderOakMobileClient Now it's worth a look again. Also rsync.net. -dsr- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
