I’m not going to go back and forth about this all night… So I’m signing off of this thread after this response else it turns into a classic tl;dr.
> On Oct 6, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Rich Pieri <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/6/2015 7:30 PM, Anthony Gabrielson wrote: >> No… > > Yes. It's a monolithic data store with every user's identifying credentials > in it. It doesn't matter how that data is stored. It doesn't matter what > transformations are performed on that data. It's still in one place and the > whole thing can be taken in one swoop PGP is not a monolithic data store although it can interface with one. DoD encryption boxes are not monolithic. It all depends on the model and how trust is defined and established. > >> It sounds like you’re asking for: - Secure Comms - Anonymity > > No, not anonymity. If I do business with Amazon for example there is no > anonymity or else they couldn't charge my credit card and I wouldn't receive > my stuff. What I'm asking for is a mechanism where rather than me > authenticating myself with Amazon, it is Amazon's services which authenticate > themselves with me. > > No, I don't know how to make it work. I wish I did. I wish someone did. What are your requirements and why? _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
