On December 14, 2015, Matthew Gillen wrote: >[Perhaps] certain applications try to be too cute with their memory >management[...]. So loading that 1MB image, which should take 256 >4KB pages now takes 256 2MB pages, which comes out to ~536MB. Which >is probably more memory than you have spare on your system. >Does that sound plausible (excusing any arithmetic errors)?
It sounds like a plausible hypothesis to me, but in my case, the machine in question had 28 gigs of free RAM, so allocating 500MB or even 5000MB shouldn't be a problem. -- Dan Barrett [email protected] _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
