On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 09:56:23PM -0400, David Kramer wrote: > https://opensource.com/article/17/3/etckeeper-version-control > > Sounds good, and I can't think of any downsides. I think the value add of > etckeeper over just adding /etc to git is that it ties into package > management and every change in /etc/ caused by a package install gets > committed to git as such. I'm not sure if those silent commits are a good > thing or not. >
I use it on a couple of boxes that aren't being kept by chef. It's very nice for showing history and making a backup against fumble-finger mistakes. -dsr- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
