On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:16:36AM -0700, Rich Braun wrote: > Because I just don't see a need for going beyond 1Gbps within the home during > the course of my life. Maybe 10Gbps applications will materialize, but for now > there's just not much reason I'll need more than a half-dozen streams of 4K > video flying around the house at any given time. In my current situation there > are only two or three places in the house where I wish I had at least that > second RJ45 jack that the idiot who wired the place failed to install; and I > wish I had conduit running between two core locations to support the HA setup > that I have. > > The future's hard to predict but I think we're coming near the end of > practical advancements in home-networking performance. Guess I'm a luddite.
A field of view about 180 degrees wide, 135 degrees high, 1 arc minute in minimum pixel size, and updated 100 times per second… twice, to account for full stereography, and using 48 bits of color. 180 * 135 * 60 * 60 * 100 * 48 = 419904000000, 420 billion bits per second. Compress 100:1, we're still at 4.2Gb/s, plus some relatively minor trivia for audio, osmic and haptic data. Per simultaneous user, of course. -dsr- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss