Only one question inline
On 4/5/2013 10:36 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> +static void timer_function_scheduler_timeout (void *data)
> +{
> + struct scheduler_pause_timeout_data *timeout_data = (struct
> scheduler_pause_timeout_data *)data;
> + unsigned long long tv_current;
> + unsigned long long tv_diff;
> +
> + tv_current = timerlist_nano_current_get ();
are we sure the value returned from this function is increased regularly
even if the VM is "slowing down" from outside (host scheduling)?
Otherwise the patch looks good to me (nitpick a couple of extra \n)
Fabio
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
