Hi All,

I thank for release of corosync2.3.5.

We used the "rrp_mode:active" setting so far.

The "rrp_mode: active" did not seem to be recommended when I saw release note 
of corosync2.3.5.


What is the cause that was not recommended from this time?
In addition, is there a point to be careful about when we continue using 
"ative"?

 * We want to know a problem and the influence that were not recommended in 
detail.


Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.


_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to