As I understand it, most of the development team of OOo jumped ship to set up LibO in anticipation of Oracle making unacceptable changes to the OOo concept. I don't know how many they are, but I'd be surprised if they're over 30, and as far as I and most users are concerned, they "own" the product. Many of those of us in here appear to be jumping on the bandwagon after the event, and some of us will stay, and others will relapse into being grateful users who understand that they don't actually have much to offer. I probably belong in this latter group.
But the point is, the 30 or whatever developers have been planning this for some time. They didn't launch LibO after a beer last Friday, and they, for better or worse, chose LibreOffice as the name. We're never going to get nearer than 10% agreement however many names we suggest or polls we run, so let's live with their name, be grateful for their enthusiasm and let them get on with turning 3.3 beta into 3.3 release instead of slagging them for being undemocratic or dictatorial. Viva LibO Just my $0.02 //James -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
