On 2010-10-07 8:58 AM, Marc Paré wrote: > I think this is too extreme. A user would have to then decypher the > LibO naming convention and it would then become impossible to manage > the different language permutations of these names. > > I would vote that the LibO apply the ISO naming conventions where > applicable and where there is no convention, make sure that they are > easily understood by any user. The naming convention should also be > detailed in a FAQ on the LibO site so that we all follow the same > format.
I don't care what the list name itself is, I'm talking about the [SUBJECT TAG]. So I'll reiterate - if these huge/long subject tags are going to be implemented, please, please provide user customizable list options so that users who don't want/need them can disable them completely - as I said, they are useless and a total waste of space for me (and most anyone who filters on LISTID headers rather than subject tag s). -- Best regards, Charles -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to [email protected] All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
