Thanks for the reply, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote: >Would you be able to get some people helping to >describe what needs to >be done? If you can find some other developers >interested in hacking >that part, I'm ready to help them getting started!
Unfortunately, I am a simple user... A problem I had is that the footnotes/endnote do not contain the correct style of citation (Latin abbreviations). Sorry, this is my only experience. For instance http://unilearning.uow.edu.au/academic/4di.html http://www.occc.edu/comlab/handouts/chicago-style-handout.pdf http://www.aresearchguide.com/7footnot.html Now Writer uses only Short name or Number. However, it is important to remember that there are national differences in reference style. I understand that rethink Reference Manager/Citation Style is a very big job and needs a lot of work before it's properly usable. The road of LibO has just begun. Just my personal opinion, the alphabetical index only needs to be improved, because the schema does not need to be rethought. Regards, Jacques PS. A bug (LibO3.3beta Xpsp3):table tolbar -> "Line Style" button. Not working. -- View this message in context: http://documentfoundation.969070.n3.nabble.com/LibO-roadmap-tp1667731p1683509.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to [email protected] All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
