Hi, Top posting from my phone... This is not an easy answer to give. Both strategies have pros and cons. My advice would be to start where we are but alter the numbering scheme wildly: 3.3, 3.5 and then 4.0 instead of 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 like OOo.
Charles. Le 3 nov. 2010, 12:03 PM, "Michael Meeks" <[email protected]> a écrit : Hi there, On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:57 +0100, Andre Schnabel wrote: > I'd rather continue OOo version number s... I think being similar enough to it is worthwhile. On the other hand, I think being slaved to Hamburg's development schedule is unfortunate overall. I'd like to release on a different cadence. But for now it is fine of course. And in future a major version bump - sounds reasonable. ATB, Michael. -- [email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot -- E-mail to [email protected]<steering-discuss%[email protected]>for instructions on how to unsubscribe... -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
