Charles-H. Schulz schrieb: > Hello Varun > > > Le Wed, 17 Nov 2010 06:08:01 +0800, > Varun Mittal <[email protected]> a écrit : > > >> Hi All, >> >> Maybe we can have a JCP like system wherein all members vote. >> >> We can also give the sponsors a particular number of seats ( non-veto >> powers) to the sponsors who have supported it . >> >> I propose not exactly a JCP like system but we can look at a modified >> version of JCP voting system >> >> What do you guys feel ? >> > > I am very much against your proposal that sponsors could have more > seats or something similar. One Member = One Vote. Clear and Simple. > > +1 > OTOH, I am not familiar with the JCP voting process. > But if I may suggest: perhaps that level of details does not need to be > mentioned in the bylaws? Keep in mind that everything we put there will > automatically be difficult to change. > > The difficulty of changing the voting procedure is a point to mention it in the by-laws.
It shows from the beginning a distinct procedure of voting (whatever it looks like). This gives a reliability to each member/sponsor etc. that the voting-process isn't changeable that easy. Nobody must fear, that for the next election her/his vote doesn't count any more because a minority/small majority thinks to have found a better way of election. just 0,02 € Karl-Heinz -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
