The UI improvements look good and might just make it easier for people who liked the MSOffice Ribbon and/or dislike the current UI. I think the design could go along way
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Ron Faile <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/20/2010 2:30 AM, Ron Faile wrote: > >> >NoOP is right, I wrote the quoted text. Your explanation is well >> >noted and I can see the reasoning behind it. The sooner we can change >> >the interface and feel of LibreOffice then the better, as I for one >> >don't want such a Oracle aligning feature as version numbers staring >> >me in the face every time I start up my non-proprietary office suite >> > >> >On 11/20/10, NoOp <[email protected]> wrote: >> >On 11/19/2010 06:22 PM, Michel Gagnon wrote: >> >> Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit : >> >>> On 11/19/2010 03:26 PM, Sean White wrote: >> >>>> As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office >> >>>> project >> >>>> derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their >> version >> >>>> numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to reinforce >> in >> >>>> peoples minds that we are a separate project. >> >> Take a look at the UI improvements page, >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Default_UI_Improvements >> >> I just uploaded a file (item 11) with some ideas that might set LibO >> apart. Namely a new menu structure. Would be interested in your comments. >> >> Ron >> > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: Email to > [email protected]<discuss%[email protected]> > Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived *** > > -- Sean White, I've Seen the Cow Level -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to [email protected] Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
