Thanks for that link, it was a real help. I can't say I'm pleased, but the decision has been made and I will not go against the steering community. Something I did note was that a-lot of the points we have raised match theirs concept-for-concept if not word-for-word.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Christoph Noack < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > since it is a bit hard for me to find the right place to "jump in", here > some decision on the version numbers question - the Steering Committee > discussed that some weeks ago. > > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Version_Numbering_Scheme_for_LibreOffice > : > > Hope that helps! > > Christoph > > Am Samstag, den 20.11.2010, 10:26 +1100 schrieb Sean White: > > As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office project > > derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version > > numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to reinforce in > > peoples minds that we are a separate project. > > > > -- > > Sean White, > > Concerned User > > > > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > [email protected]<discuss%[email protected]> > Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > > -- Sean White, I've Seen the Cow Level -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
