>Mhh, I did not see your note as anything new. But Maybe I should have >mailed that ;-) >But ignored? Far from that.
Cor, thank you for the reply. In my mind it doesn't make any sense that the mailing lists are so self contained that I have to guess in which one I have to post. And if I fail to post on the right list it will be either ignored or not answered (which from the poster's point of view is the same...) It doesn't also make sense that I have to subscribe to several mailing lists when ONE forum would be enough. >See the OOo wiki for analyses/ideas/tasks on Calc and performance. >And also the LibreOffice dev list shows abundant signs of awareness that >improvements on performance are very important. It wouldn't cross my mind searching the OOo wiki, when I'm asking to the LO community. I'm finished with the OOo community for a long time. They had/have a serious attitude/communication problem which I hope doesn't propagate to LO (and your answer shows that it's not ;) ) What puzzles me is that I can't find any logic that LO/OOo which is the Office suite behind the ODF standard is in fact LESS efficient handling that format than another FLOSS program... Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Why-is-LO-OOo-so-slow-loading-a-spreadsheet-tp2006665p2017245.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
