Hi, Le Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:45:29 +0100, Cor Nouws <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Benjamin Horst wrote (14-12-10 16:21) > > > I agree with you about the possible negative connotations of the > > term "manager," but I think it's just a terminology problem. You > > could think of the role as "Community Facilitator" or even "host" > > if you prefer. The actual tasks inherent to the role are similar to > > the host of a party--introducing people to others with similar > > interests, helping to coordinate times, places and necessities, etc. > > > > In practice, it's hugely helpful to have someone walking around to > > make sure that good ideas don't get lost and plans receive > > encouragement and assistance until they are completed. They can also > > play the role of matchmaker, to help find volunteers for important > > initiatives that don't have enough helpers. > > > > I also understand the desire to form a clean break from the past and > > to build our own thing this time. I think it's the right approach, > > but I don't think it means we can eliminate the role of the > > community manager, though renaming it to better suit our project's > > culture certainly makes sense. > > +1 > Very well said, IMO. > A good manager serves the community. A manager is not a commander. > Being a good manager is a time-consuming task. It involves knowing > what is going on, understanding the 'how-to's' of many community > members, and finding a balance between letting flow, and linking > actively, proposing, intervening etc. > I am sure our bye-laws provide us with some officers, of which I > expect one to do this job. Yes, that would be the Executive Director. But it cannot be its only role. He/she can facilitate, help out, provide leadership in case it's needed, but he's neither the mummy, nor the commander of the powers that be in front of the community. It also means that the culture of our community -again let me insist on that- has to change. We should be doing things, and contributing is how we're recognized. Playing by the rule is one thing, but on the other hand asking for permission to some overlord is not what we're doing and won't be doing. Hence, from a posture of audience -in spite of all the good will- we need to switch to a posture of contribution. Don't get me wrong, that's pretty much what we are doing, so I'm cautiously optimistic :-) Best, Charles. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
