Hello,
Le Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:01:09 +0000, Michael Meeks <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Charles, > > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 18:04 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > I have thus taken Michael's input and adapted it to our existing > > proposal. In substance, the TM policy itself *hasn't changed* I > > simply added one more link in the text to our logo guideline. > > Looks good; we still talk exclusively about Trademarks, where > I would really prefer 'Marks' to be used everywhere (as it was at the > beginning). IMHO that separation was introduced to try to create a new > category for logos, and I don't believe we want that. > > The exemplary pointer right in the middle of the hard rules > is odd. Our guidelines are extremely practical ;-) so I would say: > > - (see our simplified logo policy for more practical information) > + (see our simplified logo policy for some examples) > > I would also remove the blurb at the beginning. > > "While this document covers the topics related to Trademark > Policy, you may find more practical information about our > logos and how to use them here." > > as part of that too; no need for two links. > > Otherwise, with that included, I'm for approving this this as > the best I can persuade you to iterate to as of now without advice to > back me up, IANAL etc. ;-) > So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the text according to some of your corrections above (not all of them). I'd like to call for a vote (the final one) starting now until Tuesday at noon Foundation time. Best, Charles. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
