Am 29.03.2011 23:24, schrieb Norbert Thiebaud: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Michael Meeks <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I'd also like to hear from some of our new developers that liked that >> page - again, on the dev list. >> > The easy hack page has hugely grown since I started. I guess that is a > good thing, but in my opinion it's current form is not very practical > nor inviting. > > I think that grouping easy-hack by 'nature' and then by difficulty do > make sense. Difficulty is a very subjective measure, > and something that is a 'easy gui hack' for someone may be a daunting > task for someone else... when I was parsing this > list I would first look at the title, then the skill required and > _then_ the degree of difficulty announced - mostly to > verify my first impression based on the previous 2 items. > So, I do like the 'nature' oriented classification proposed, but maybe > we could keep a one line overview of each task with a link for a > dedicated page per task > That way, a given task can be expended with as much information as > needed without flooding the main page, including volunteer's progress > report, declaration of intent and/or > questions/answer section to clarify the task if need be. > > That way the main page still give a global overview of all easy-hack, > but become much more readable... > If the task are limited, on the main page to a one-liner, then the ToC > doesn't have to be 3 pages long.... > > Norbert > just a question: Is there a database in the wiki? in this case could we build a table with the necessary variables and display the tasks by selection of skills and difficulty?
Regards Karl-Heinz -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
