On 4 June 2011 17:29, Gianluca Turconi <pub...@letturefantastiche.com>wrote:
> In data 04 giugno 2011 alle ore 17:59:04, Ian Lynch <ianrly...@gmail.com> > ha scritto: > > > That is why we need to see if it is possible to cooperate such that those >> with a philosphical aversion to contributing to the Apache licensed code >> don't have to yet still achieve some coherence in the code base itself. It >> seems inevitable that there will be a copyleft product overseen by TDF and >> an ASF licensed product. >> > > Is it sure there will be a *product*? > I think IBM need it for symphony so on those grounds alone I'd say there will be code licensed so that it can be used in that product as a minimum. > > That's rather important, because who uses the Apache license is usually > interested in having a *project* that is a rather different beast. ;-) Agreed, the IBM proprietary product would be a different beast from LO. But let's face it there are already many OOo variants out there. I don't think that changes that much. I think Michael's point about which code contributions are effectively blocked to which developers is the more difficult one. Personally I know this is a mess but making it less of a mess through cooperation seems a better route than trying to achieve something unachievable. -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications The Schools ITQ www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940 You have received this email from the following company: The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted