Le 2011-06-04 17:29, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
Hi *,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Sam Ruby<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch<[email protected]> wrote:
I should think there is probably
broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold on to the copyright
such as tax relief or just in case it *might* somehow become valuable.
Oracle offered to transfer the copyright, and I said that it was
neither necessary nor required.
I second that. the TDF would have been more than pleased if Oracle
would have re-licensed the code under LGPL+MPL combination (+apache
and whatever). Copyright ownership is not required at all. Neither for
Apache, nor for TDF.
ciao
Christian
Could not Apache Foundation do the same thing once it got the code?
Cheers
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
