On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Uwe Altmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Garry > > Am 17.06.11 23:45, schrieb NoOp: >> In the past I'd answered a few questions regarding OOo ECCN[1] and >> pointed the poster to Sun's ECCN[2]. What are the implications for LO >> general with regards to ECCN? I do see that Novell/Attachmate Group do >> list an ECCN for LO[3] with a category of 5D992. >> >> Given that questions eventually will come up regarding LO & ECCN by US >> Government/Business users,... > > As I can see, the Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) is an > issue dealing with /exports from US/. > AFAIK LO is not a US Product nor exported from within US (not even > hosted there) and therefore this should be a no-issue :-)
AIUI it would be a good idea for the TDF to consult it's US legal team about whether this is really the case... Robert -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
