Michael Meeks wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 14:45 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > everybody (now!) knows the priority of the Document Foundation > > has been to stick to the licenses it had unilaterally chosen, before > > discussing any further options; this is perfectly understandable and > > acceptable of course. > > By unilaterally chosen - the reality included private discussion with > and approval from IBM
Ah, thanks for disclosing this non-trivial detail. Of course, like everybody, I can only comment on what happens in public and not on what happens in secret... One more reason to appreciate the current transparency policy of the Document Foundation (in the bylaws) and hope it will be applied consistently in future. Regards, Andrea. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
