At 02:33 21-7-2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/20/2011 05:02 PM, e-letter wrote:
> On the users mailing list, a significant proportion of a random view
> of questions seems to be with relation to using LO is some way with m$
> document formats.
> (...)
I might also conclude that there is NO reason to support any other
file format either. I mean, really, why should I support a non-ODF
format? PDF generation? Remove it! (...)
Please don't remove PDF generation. That would be the end of the only
free and open-source PDF generator that produces "tagged PDF", which
is a requirement for accessibility.
Best regards,
Christophe
--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
Twitter: @RabelaisA11y
---
Open source for accessibility: results from the AEGIS project
www.aegis-project.eu
---
Please don't invite me to Facebook, Quechup or other "social
networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
