Frankly, I'm sure the law just says copies must be kept and doesn't care how they are kept. The point is that they *will* be kept on secured digital media, which means MSO, which means they will need a copy of MSO, which means they will not need a copy of LibO.
That was rather my point. We cannot compete with what has been done in the past unless we deal with those legacy documents that will be kept anyway. On 30/07/2011 14:33, e-letter wrote: > On 23/07/2011, Mark Preston <m...@mpreston.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> Look, lets be honest about this - Microsoft has by far the largest >> proportion of legacy documents out there and there is no way that >> people can manage without access to those documents. Apart from >> anything else, the law will require them to be kept and available if >> needed for any future investigations. > > Does the law require these documents to be stored in the native binary > format, or would a paper copy archive be considered acceptable. In any > case, is this relevant to LO? Why wouldn't users simply keep an old > version of m$? Is it not possible for m$ to be used for legacy > documents and use LO for future documents in the native odf? > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
