On 04/09/2011, Cor Nouws <oo...@nouenoff.nl> wrote: > Hi e-letter, > > e-letter wrote (04-09-11 10:31) > >> These typical m$ queries are irrelevant to LO. If you want to create >> m$ documents, get money out of your pocket and pay for m$o. If the >> expected and desired behaviour occurs with the native odt format, then >> LO is good. > > Sorry, but I am not so happy with your post. > Not only does it not help the poster with his question, it also breathes > a negative attitude towards Microsoft. Which may be your or any ones > personal choice, but is not the tone I would like to see promoted here. >
Long-term it does help, in terms of making very clear to the original poster that the priority is superior performance of LO. There is no negative attitude towards m$ except your own perception. The position is clear, help LO odt, not m$. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
