On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Wolfgang Keller <felip...@gmx.net> wrote: >> While working on my wiki page about a new Writer toolbar, I realized >> that independently of my proposal, I believe it makes sense for >> LibreOffice to prefer Python. I see how LO is heading in this >> direction, but you could be explicit about it, create more workitems, >> perhaps track it like you do the German comments and uncalled >> functions, etc. > > It could also be helpful to have a handbook for PyUno... ;-) > > The point is that a *lot* of users of Python (and there are bulkloads > out there) are non-developers who don't give a darn for Java or VBA > (because those don't provide what these users need) and who might have > never even learned C++. > > So without specific documentation they're essentially stalled, while > with a handbook, you could get a lot of helpers to implement additions > in Python. > > Looks like a classic "multiplier" situation to me.
Is there a bug about this? Is the handbook to be built by the doc team? It seems like a lack of samples / handbook could be a big reason for the stalled pipeline of Python patches. Warm regards, -Keith -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
