On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas <larry.gus...@gmail.com> wrote: On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas <larry.gus...@gmail.com> wrote: > No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice > on Macs with your code change.
*I* broke it? Sorry Larry I'm just a user like you. > It worked before. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Libreoffice *fixed* a bug that brought to light a Mac bug. Deal with it. It isn't Libreoffice's responsibility to 'work around' everyone else's bugs. > Any new user of LibreOffice on Macs will find out the database > doesn't work. No - they will find that a *few* features/functions won't work. The reality is *most* will never know it. > It is not Apples's responsibility to make your software usable There is a *bug* in Apple's provided JRE package that has been there for a very long time. The Libreoffice devs finally decided to make a change to their code that stops 'working around' Apple's long standing bug (at least thats how I read the comments)... There is a simple workaround that *you* can employ - install the JDK - until Apple fixes *their* JRE package bug. Enjoy... -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
