-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fred Benenson wrote:
> Indeed, Public Library of Science, and a lot of > other open access journals all depend on Creative Commons (and in turn, > copyright) for licensing of their works. Attribution is a good thing to protect. I believe an attribution requirement is an acceptable restriction on use. Copyleft (sharealike) is a good thing to protect, as well. If there is no serious disagreement about this (I don't expect any) we can assume a copyright "nullification" to leave intact optional enforcement of attribution and/or copyleft requirements. With this amendment on copyright "nullification," a nullification is sufficient to sustain all these great projects. The only thing that depends on copyright are additional, more controversial restrictions on use. None of these are necessary to sustain open access. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF5J7M6THm0ATXcbwRAu2mAJ4hmaPXZfETJWMSwX/XKeeSnphuFgCgxeY4 i1z2bWXjZHeMxhVBCGgod0A= =sufK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
