Right, but my point is that legally, the may have only wanted people to download from their site and NOT from elsewhere, thus not allowing redistribution. (And also not allowing higher bitrates.)
This probably isn't the case, but this seems to be the technical legal interpretation. On 10/22/07, Fred Benenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We must assume that they were anticipating for everyone to share the mp3s. > This is why they released them as 160kbps files, so that the ones popular on > the networks wouldn't compete with the box set and the real CD. > > I think, however, it's too much to assume that they are necessarily OK > with people redistributing them. It's a shame because this is a clear case > of where a CC-BY-NC-ND license would have worked perfectly. > > Anyway, it's an interesting twist: Radiohead has been able to wrangle > control over their own media by staggering the release of different quality > versions. I think this is actually a viable model -- but we'll have to see > how popular the CD is when it is sold, as there will inevitably be 320kbps > versions floating around then. They may have just gotten enough people to > pre-order it that it won't matter. > > > Still, a perfect case of where a CC license would have been a great show > of good faith. > > > F > > > On 10/22/07, Elizabeth Stark < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Will, > > > > As far as I can tell, it's still technically ARR. That said, they're > > making it available to anyone who wants to go to their site and download it > > for free, so there's obviously some kind of implied license there. That > > implied license wouldn't go so far as to say that others can distribute it, > > as it only would apply to downloading it directly from their site. > > > > Despite the technicalities, it doesn't seem as if they're all too > > opposed to others sharing their album, even if not downloaded from their > > site. But we're talking about technicalities here. :) > > > > -E > > > > On 10/22/07, William Norton < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Can someone please clarify if he or she knows the actual copyright > > > status of Radiohead's album. Obviously, it's available for free (or at > > > least really cheap) on their website, but is it legal for others to > > > distribute? > > > > > > The Radiohead model is a great step that could have a profound impact > > > on the industry, but it seems like Free Culture would advocate going one > > > step further in terms of reserving rights. > > > > > > Will > > > > > > > > > On 10/22/07, Elizabeth Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Fred, do you or others think that more bands will start following > > > > the Radiohead model? (At least those that are more well-known and have > > > > large, established fan bases.) > > > > > > > > On 10/22/07, Fred Benenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I think its a good idea too, but unfortunately the "big rock > > > > > and roll groups" are mostly controlled by record executives who don't > > > > > really > > > > > want to allow people to share music. > > > > > > > > > > on the other hand, there are groups like The Grateful Dead and > > > > > Phish whom actively encourage their fans to share their music. > > > > > > > > > > I've found that it is supremely difficult to convince established > > > > > musicians to start giving their work away for free. It is either a > > > > > decision > > > > > they make for themselves, and come to however they come to it, or one > > > > > they > > > > > don't make at all -- that is they pass it off to whomever is managing > > > > > the > > > > > band or record. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That said, the more big acts that release their work freely, the > > > > > better. > > > > > > > > > > Hope that helps, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > F > > > > > > > > > > On 10/22/07, Fernando Wermus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I am new at the list, and I would like to know if there has > > > > > > been any campaign to free music. Does anyone talk to big rock and > > > > > > roll > > > > > > groups to free its music? where can I find some info related to > > > > > > that? > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Fernando Wermus. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Discuss mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Discuss mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Discuss mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Discuss mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
